![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/9ea479_0253da97a0444041981b1d1151a27215~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_500,h_500,al_c,q_85,enc_avif,quality_auto/9ea479_0253da97a0444041981b1d1151a27215~mv2.png)
Note from the previous lesson giving us the task:
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/9ea479_765e12653b7d4e2085aad10c1237143d~mv2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_980,h_905,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/9ea479_765e12653b7d4e2085aad10c1237143d~mv2.jpeg)
Honey & Mumford Learning styles Questionnaire
The Honey and Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire is a tool designed to help individuals identify their preferred learning style. Developed by Peter Honey and Alan Mumford, it categorizes learners into four distinct types:
Activists: Learners who prefer to engage in new experiences, tackle problems head-on, and learn through doing. They thrive on challenges and excitement.
Reflectors: Learners who like to observe and think about what happened, taking their time to analyse and reflect before drawing conclusions. They prefer to gather data and consider different perspectives.
Theorists: Learners who enjoy understanding the theory behind actions, preferring a structured approach with logical analysis. They appreciate models, concepts, and systematic thinking.
Pragmatists: Learners who are keen on applying new ideas in practice. They prefer practical, realistic approaches and enjoy experimenting with new techniques.
The questionnaire consists of a series of questions that assess an individual's reactions and attitudes towards various learning situations. By analysing the responses, it helps individuals identify their dominant learning style, which can enhance their learning strategies and improve personal and professional development.
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/9ea479_3b20f115dbc54660b5570de410957015~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_636,h_506,al_c,q_85,enc_avif,quality_auto/9ea479_3b20f115dbc54660b5570de410957015~mv2.png)
Honey & Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire
My checked answers are blue:
I have strong beliefs about what is right and wrong, good and bad
I often act without considering the possible consequences
I tend to solve problems using a step-by-step approach
I believe that formal policies and procedures restrict people
I have a reputation for saying what I think, simply and directly
I often find that actions based on feelings are as sound as those based on careful thought and analysis
I like the sort of work where I have time for thorough preparation
I regularly question people about their basic assumptions
What matters most is whether something works in practice
I actively seek out new experiences
When I hear about a new idea or approach I immediately start working out how to apply it in practice
I am keen on self discipline such as watching my diet, taking regular exercise, sticking to a fixed routine etc
I take pride in doing a thorough job
I get on best with logical, analytical people and less with spontaneous 'irrational' people
I take care over the interpretation of data available to me and avoid jumping to conclusions
I like to reach a decision carefully after weighing up many alternatives
I am attracted more to novel, unusual ideas than to practical ones
I don't like disorganised things and prefer to fit into a coherent pattern
I accept and stick to laid down procedures and policies so long as I regard them as an efficient way of getting the job done
I like to relate my actions to a general principle
In discussions I like to get straight to the point
I tend to have distant, rather formal relationships with people at work
I thrive on the challenge of tackling something new and different
I enjoy fun-loving spontaneous people
I pay meticulous attention to detail before coming to a conclusion
I find it difficult to produce ideas on impulse
I believe in coming to the point immediately
I am careful not to jump to conclusions too quickly
I prefer to have as many sources of information as possible - the more data to think over the better
Flippant people who don't take things seriously enough usually irritate me
I listen to other people's point of view before putting my own forward
I tend to be open about how I'm feeling
In discussions I enjoy watching the manoeuvrings of the other participants
I prefer to respond to events on a spontaneous, flexible basis, rather than plan things out in advance
I tend to be attracted to techniques such as network analysis, flow charts, branching programmes, contingency planning
It worries me if I have to rush out a piece of work to meet a tight deadline
I tend to judge people's ideas on their practical merits
Quiet, thoughtful people tend to make me feel uneasy
I often get irritated by people who want to rush things
It is more important to enjoy the present moment than to think about the past or future
I think that decisions based on a thorough analysis of all the information are sounder than those based on intuition
I tend to be a perfectionist
In discussions I usually produce lots of spontaneous ideas
In meetings I put forward practical realistic ideas
More often than not, rules are there to be broken
I prefer to stand back from a situation and consider all the perspectives
I can often see inconsistencies and weaknesses in other people's arguments
On balance, I talk more than I listen
I can often see better, more practical ways to get things done
I think written reports should be short and to the point
I believe that rational, logical thinking should win the day
I tend to discuss specific things with people, rather than engaging in social discussion
I like people who approach things realistically rather than theoretically
In discussions I get impatient with irrelevancies and digressions
If I have a report to write I tend to produce lots of drafts before settling on the final version
I am keen to try things out to see if they work in practice
I am keen to reach answers by a logical approach
I enjoy being the one who talks a lot
In discussion I often find I am the realist, keeping people to the point, avoiding wild speculations
I like to ponder many alternatives before making up my mind
In discussions with people I often find I am the most dispassionate and objective
In discussions I'm more likely to adopt a 'low profile' than to take the lead and do most of the talking
I like to relate current actions to a longer term, bigger picture
When things go wrong I'm happy to shrug it off and put it down to experience
I tend to reject wild, spontaneous ideas as being impractical
It's best to think carefully before taking action
On balance I do the listening rather than the talking
I tend to be tough on people who find it difficult to adopt a logical approach
Most times I believe the end justifies the means
I don't mind hurting people's feelings so long as the job gets done
I find the formality of having Learning outcomes and plans stifling
I'm usually one of the people who puts life into a party
I do whatever is expedient to get the job done
I quickly get bored with methodical, detailed work
I am keen on exploring the basic assumptions and theories underpinning things and events
I'm always interested to find out what people think
I like meetings to be run on methodical lines, sticking to laid down agenda
I steer clear of subjective or ambiguous topics
I enjoy the drama and excitement of a crisis situation
People often find me insensitive to their feelings
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/9ea479_ddd6bed5465f44d0b337b030543037f0~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_602,h_777,al_c,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/9ea479_ddd6bed5465f44d0b337b030543037f0~mv2.png)
The Reflector personality in the Honey and Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire is characterized by a preference for observing and reflecting on experiences. Reflectors are meticulous, thoughtful, and cautious, often taking a step back to consider situations from different perspectives before making decisions or taking action. Here are some key traits and behaviours associated with Reflectors:
Observation and Reflection: Reflectors prefer to watch and listen, gathering as much information as possible. They are keen observers who reflect deeply on their experiences and the experiences of others before drawing conclusions.
Thoughtful and Considerate: Reflectors are careful thinkers who take their time to analyse situations. They consider all possible angles and implications before acting. This thoughtful approach helps them to avoid rash decisions and mistakes.
Cautious and Methodical: Reflectors tend to be cautious and methodical, ensuring they have a comprehensive understanding of a situation before proceeding. They value thoroughness and accuracy over speed.
Preference for Detailed Information: Reflectors like detailed and well-structured information. They prefer to have all the facts and evidence available to make informed decisions.
Learning by Observation: Reflectors learn best by watching others, reflecting on their actions, and thinking about how they would handle similar situations. They benefit from opportunities to observe different approaches and outcomes.
Avoidance of Immediate Participation: Reflectors are less likely to jump into new experiences or activities immediately. They prefer to observe and think about them first, and may sometimes be perceived as hesitant or slow to engage.
Feedback and Review: Reflectors value feedback and use it to refine their understanding and improve their performance. They are open to constructive criticism and view it as an opportunity for learning and growth.
In educational and professional settings, Reflectors thrive in environments where they have time to think, analyse, and observe. They benefit from activities that allow for reflection, such as journaling, group discussions where they can listen before speaking, and opportunities to review and synthesize information. Recognizing and accommodating the Reflector learning style can help individuals leverage their strengths and improve their learning outcomes.
Commentaires